(#6) Kentucky Man Challenges Obama Citizenship

NC Susan

Deceased
Whitley man demands proof of Obama's U.S. birth

By Bill Estep - bestep@herald-leader.com

http://www.kentucky.com/181/story/611448.html

Kentucky is a red state with no shortage of conspiracy theorists and unusual politics, so it's no surprise that what might be the first post-election court challenge to Barack Obama's qualifications to be president comes from a Whitley County truck driver.

Daniel John Essek, 47, filed a demand last week that Obama prove he is a natural-born U.S. citizen — one of the few requirements to run for president.





Essek wants Obama to provide a copy of his birth certificate to a federal judge in London for verification.
He knows some people might find his request odd, especially after the election, but says he would tell them it's never too late to do the right thing.
"I may very well be chasing windmills thinking they're monsters," he acknowledged.
Essek lost by more than 100,000 votes when he tried to unseat longtime Republican U.S. Sen Mitch McConnell in the primary election this year. He later said on a Web site "maybe I got a little carried away, like my wife said."


The charge that Obama wasn't born in the United States came up often during the presidential campaign. Obama's campaign said that was ridiculous, posting a copy of his birth certificate on the Internet to prove he was born in Hawaii.


A Pennsylvania judge threw out a pre-election court challenge to Obama's birth qualification, saying its arguments were frivolous.
But Essek still has doubts.
Essek said he'll be satisfied if U.S. District Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove receives documents from Obama and rules Obama is qualified to serve as president.
What Essek filed was actually a request for permission to file the court case without having to pay a fee.
"I also affirm, owing to my poverty, having not the money, request all fees of this filing and service be waived," he wrote, citing his income in the last year as $15,000.
Essek said in the motion that he is founder of the Society for Liberty and Prosperity. Last week he said the society had no members but had scheduled an organizational meeting Saturday night at his home just north of the Tennessee line, has set up a Web site and is seeking members and donors.
Essek is president of the group. His wife, Donna, is treasurer.
Essek wants to use the society to teach citizenship and correct what he considers Americans' woeful lack of civic education and awareness. Some people can't identify the president, vice president and secretary of state, he said.
"I'm seeing a level of ignorance out there like you wouldn't believe," Essek said.
There are other objectives, too, according to the society's Web site, including defending rights, opposing tax increases and (in the exact words) to "eschew barbarism, collectivism, Communism, conformitism, despitism,, fachism, favoritism, imperialism, institutionalism, liberalism, Nazism, nepitism, progressivism, racism, sexism and Socialism."
Essek's Senate race Web site said he endorsed Ron Paul, a Republican congressman from Texas who leans strongly libertarian, for president this year. In November, he voted for John McCain because of Sarah Palin, he said.
But Essek said politics isn't the reason he's questioning Obama's qualifications.
"This is patriotism," he said.
 

NC Susan

Deceased
http://countusout.wordpress.com/200...atural-born-citizen-requirement/#comment-3892


Obama’s Friends Working to Amend the Natural Born Citizen Requirement

via LadyHawkke, Count Us Out Reader
Read this: Amending the Natural Born Citizen Requirement
It is obvious BO is not natural born or his friends wouldn’t be trying so hard to make him one.
http://www.patriotbrigaderadio.com/barracks/index.php?topic=250.0 :

If the Facts Don’t Support the Theory, Destroy the Facts
Comment left by: CreativeOgre:
While digging my way through the Internet last night, I came across the following paper, written by SARAH P. HERLIHY. It’s title
AMENDING THE NATURAL BORN CITIZEN REQUIREMENT: GLOBALIZATION AS THE IMPETUS AND THE OBSTACLE
caught my eye, and had to read it…
http://lawreview.kentlaw.edu/articles/81-1/Herlihy.pdf
I had to ask myself, what would drive any American to want to change a clause in a document that is the very foundation of our government?
So, I kept digging, and found that SARAH P. HERLIHY is employed by Kirkland & Ellis LLP http://www.kirkland.com
Noting that this law firm is based in Chicago, the light bulb was shining a little brighter
smiley.gif
. Upon looking at the firm, and the partners, I found that
Bruce I. Ettelson, P.C., is Member of finance committees of U.S. Senators Barack Obama and Richard Durbin.

http://www.kirkland.com/sitecontent.cfm … temID=7845 (towards bottom of the page)
In addition, Jack S. Levin, P.C., another partner who, in December 2002 was presented the ” Illinois Venture Capital Association’s lifetime achievement award for service to the private equity/venture capital community” presented by Sen. Barack Obama
So it sure looks like Obama’s people have looked into the matter of “Natural born” as far back as early 2006. What is even more disturbing is that it would appear that they are following the thought of :
“If the facts do not support the theory, Destroy the facts!”
Here is the introduction to the paper… It looks like a road map for Obama’s defense lawyers…And a precursor to a Socialist world.



AMENDING THE NATURAL BORN CITIZEN REQUIREMENT: GLOBALIZATION AS THE IMPETUS AND THE OBSTACLE
SARAH P. HERLIHY∗

INTRODUCTION
The natural born citizen requirement in Article II of the United States Constitution has been called the “stupidest provision” in the Constitution,1 “undecidedly un American,”2 “blatantly discriminatory,”3 and the “Constitution’s worst provision.”4 Since Arnold Schwarzenegger’s victory in the California gubernatorial recall election of 2003, commentators and policy-makers have once again started to discuss whether Article II of the United States Constitution should be amended to render naturalized citizens eligible for the presidency.5 Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution defines the eligibility requirements for an individual to become president. Article II provides:
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Of-fice who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.6
Although these sixty-two words are far from extraordinary, the natural born citizen provision is controversial because it prevents over 12.8 million Americans from being eligible for the presidency.7 In addition to Governor Schwarzenegger, the natural born citizen clause prohibits many other prominent Americans from becoming president, including Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm,8 former Secretaries of State Madeleine Albright and Henry Kissinger, Labor Secretary Elaine Chao,9 and over 700 Medal of Honor Winners.10 Even though many of these individuals have served in high political positions or fought in a war on behalf of America, they are not able to become president simply because they were not born in the United States.11
The natural born citizen clause of the United States Constitution should be repealed for numerous reasons. Limiting presidential eligibility to natural born citizens discriminates against naturalized citizens, is out-dated and undemocratic, and incorrectly assumes that birthplace is a proxy for loyalty. The increased globalization of the world continues to make each of these reasons more persuasive. As the world becomes smaller and cultures become more similar through globalization, the natural born citi-zen clause has increasingly become out of place in the American legal sys-tem. However, even though globalization strengthens the case for a Constitutional amendment, many Americans argue against abolishing the requirement. In a recent USA Today/CNN/Gallup Poll taken November 19–21, 2004, only 31% of the respondents favored a constitutional amendment to abolish the natural born citizen requirement while 67% opposed such an amendment.12 Although some of the reasons for maintaining the natural born citizen requirement are rational, many of the reasons are based primarily on emotion. Therefore, although globalization is one impetus that should drive Americans to rely on reason and amend the Constitution, this paper argues that common perceptions about globalization ironically will convince Americans to rely on emotion and oppose a Constitutional amendment.
Part one of this paper provides a brief history and overview of the natural born citizen requirement. Part two discusses the rational reasons for abolishing this requirement and describes why the increase in globalization makes abolishing the natural born citizen requirement more necessary than ever. Part three presents the arguments against allowing naturalized citizens to be eligible for the presidency and identifies common beliefs about glob-alization that will cause Americans to rely on emotion and oppose a Constitutional amendment.
http://www.patriotbrigaderadio.com/barracks/index.php?topic=250.0
 

MtnGal

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Good Find NC Susan. Now what to do with it? It seems like all the talking heads are afraid to bring the subject up about Obama. Any ideas?

I think Obama could swear on the Koran with Wright proceeding and Ayers holding it with MO holding an AK wearing a burka and the public would still have their head up his ... attesting to his purity as the one.
 

Kalliope

Inactive
So it sure looks like Obama’s people have looked into the matter of “Natural born” as far back as early 2006.[/B]

Isn't 2006 the year the petition drive started to get the Natural Citizenship law changed for Arnold? Yep, it sure was.
 

Kalliope

Inactive
Since only a smattering of people believe that that Obama isn't a citizen, what are ya'll going to do when it is proven (once again!!) that he is? What will ya'll bitch about then? Every other lie that ya'll have accused him of has been shot down, this one will be too (personally, I think everyone who filed suit making him prove his citizenship should be counter-sued for defamation of character and every stinkin' dime they have and will ever have be taken - there is, in black & white, and on record), then what?

I'm curious to see as to what lie ya'll will come up with. Bearing False Witness must have been thrown out of the bible. Who knew? :shr:
 

fruit loop

Inactive
Kalliope, what they'll do is bitch that it's obviously forged, it's a conspiracy, a New World Order hoax, an Illuminati plot, a Masonic spell......you name it.

These people have their own agenda and it is NOT based on justice or fairness.....just getting rid of someone they don't like.
 

MtnGal

Has No Life - Lives on TB
I for one will not complain if he is legal. My beef is why not produce it instead of hiding it. Why not show all his college papers unless he is hiding something.

"These people have their own agenda and it is NOT based on justice or fairness.....just getting rid of someone they don't like."

Justice and fairness is the issue. You can look the other way and accept anything 'the one' says - keep your blinders on.

It should be no different for him than any other citizen. I've had to show my BC and my transcripts. Being POTUS should be honorable with nothing to hide.
 

fruit loop

Inactive
He's already shown it. It's been in his office in Chicago, and on the internet, for more than two years.

The people pushing this have their own agenda, and it has nothing to do with justice. What they want is to try and discredit someone in hopes of putting one of their own in office. They're dishonest, unethical, deceitful filth.
 
Top