Buick Electra
TB2K Girls with Guns
So this guy wrote this blog not only based on past NYT and WaPo columns, but on this guy THOMAS WICTOR.
I've been following Wictor on Twitter since before the election. He is very knowledgeable of politics, our laws and history. During the election when people were freaking out about whether Hillary would steal the election, Wictor was not only a voice of calm but of knowledge. So far, 95% of what Wictor has espoused/predicted has come to fruition.
Did you know you can read someone tweets without belonging to Twitter? Just add their twitter page to your favorites....then check in on them a few times a day. Here is wictor's twitter page https://twitter.com/ThomasWictor
So in the last 72 hours when this hysteria about Flynn, Russia, and investigations came out, I would read Wictor's tweets which would keep me calm. I guess many people are reading Mr. Wictor's tweets, enough so that this guy blogged about Wictor's revelation that Trump's installing Flynn was all about a *sting* Trump set up. I guess tell time will is this bears out but in the meantime, enjoy a fascinating read.
Fair use.
February 15, 2017 by mrbiggs
Is the Flynn resignation a sting?
As I’ve said before, I’m generally not into the day to day political gossip. Especially when the mainstream press cries impeachment wolf for the countless time. So when I heard of Flynn’s resignation I initially shrugged my shoulders.
But I also take a Trump victory seriously, and I take his pledge to #draintheswamp seriously. There’s lots of slimy things in the swamp that don’t want their precious habitat destroyed, and they fight back.
So when my friend Thomas Wictor started talking about how the Flynn resignation was a sting, I started paying attention. This could very well be phase I of Trump’s plan to drain the swamp. And an indication of just how serious Trump is about commmitting to his campaign promises.
Thomas’s theory was strung along in 20 tweets. I’ve compiled them in edited form for you below. Oh, and he does some great military and foreign policy research. You should check him out.
“Let’s say a person wants to hire a killer to bump off a spouse. They ask Mikey the Biker. Mikey goes to the cops. A police officer poses as a killer for hire. He asks the person 900 times if they REALLY want to kill the spouse. The cops says, “Let’s be clear: You want this person dead, right? You want me to shoot him in the head, right?”
It was clear that the CIA was telling the media stories about Flynn having inappropriate connections to Russia. Now, imagine Trump as a cop playing a killer for hire. He began ASKING THE CIA IF IT REALLY WANTED TO DO THIS.
January 11: Trump announces that he pulled a sting operation and identified intelligence official who leaked information. Director of National Intelligence James Clapper issues a statement opposing leaks.
January 23: The OBAMA FBI CLEARS FLYNN OF WRONGDOING in his conversation with the Russian ambassador.
Now, the murderous spouse goes ahead and tries to hire the killer.
Acting Attorney General Sally Yates warns the Trump administration that Flynn might be subject to blackmail by Russia. Yates bases her warning ON A TRANSCRIPT. She’s the first murderous spouse caught in the sting. She was fired January 31 for refusing to enforce the travel ban.
February 9: The New York times and Washington Post claim that Flynn discussed sanctions with the Russian ambassador. The articles are crap. They contradict themselves. This is from the Post.
If those intelligence officials have firsthand knowledge, why can’t they tell us a straight story?
New York Times. Again, total confusion about what was said.
Posted on February 15, 2017 by mrbiggs
Is the Flynn resignation a sting?
As I’ve said before, I’m generally not into the day to day political gossip. Especially when the mainstream press cries impeachment wolf for the countless time. So when I heard of Flynn’s resignation I initially shrugged my shoulders.
But I also take a Trump victory seriously, and I take his pledge to #draintheswamp seriously. There’s lots of slimy things in the swamp that don’t want their precious habitat destroyed, and they fight back.
So when my friend Thomas Wictor started talking about how the Flynn resignation was a sting, I started paying attention. This could very well be phase I of Trump’s plan to drain the swamp. And an indication of just how serious Trump is about commmitting to his campaign promises.
Thomas’s theory was strung along in 20 tweets. I’ve compiled them in edited form for you below. Oh, and he does some great military and foreign policy research. You should check him out.
“Let’s say a person wants to hire a killer to bump off a spouse. They ask Mikey the Biker. Mikey goes to the cops. A police officer poses as a killer for hire. He asks the person 900 times if they REALLY want to kill the spouse. The cops says, “Let’s be clear: You want this person dead, right? You want me to shoot him in the head, right?”
It was clear that the CIA was telling the media stories about Flynn having inappropriate connections to Russia. Now, imagine Trump as a cop playing a killer for hire. He began ASKING THE CIA IF IT REALLY WANTED TO DO THIS.
January 11: Trump announces that he pulled a sting operation and identified intelligence official who leaked information. Director of National Intelligence James Clapper issues a statement opposing leaks.
January 23: The OBAMA FBI CLEARS FLYNN OF WRONGDOING in his conversation with the Russian ambassador.
Now, the murderous spouse goes ahead and tries to hire the killer.
Acting Attorney General Sally Yates warns the Trump administration that Flynn might be subject to blackmail by Russia. Yates bases her warning ON A TRANSCRIPT. She’s the first murderous spouse caught in the sting. She was fired January 31 for refusing to enforce the travel ban.
February 9: The New York times and Washington Post claim that Flynn discussed sanctions with the Russian ambassador. The articles are crap. They contradict themselves. This is from the Post.
If those intelligence officials have firsthand knowledge, why can’t they tell us a straight story?
New York Times. Again, total confusion about what was said.
Finally, the proof that this was a sting: FLYNN KNEW HE WAS BEING RECORDED. From the Times.
Trump warned, Clapper warned, and the FBI warned, but the CIA went ahead and leaked ANYWAY. Trump, Flynn, Clapper, and he FBI set up the CIA. And now the CIA gets to have its peepee whacked REALLY HARD. Right now a bunch of fat drunks are making deals with the feds to keep out of prison.
Why would Trump be impeached? You have to commit a crime to be impeached. Stop being silly. The end.”
http://ronfor37.org/2017/02/15/is-the-flynn-resignation-a-sting/
I've been following Wictor on Twitter since before the election. He is very knowledgeable of politics, our laws and history. During the election when people were freaking out about whether Hillary would steal the election, Wictor was not only a voice of calm but of knowledge. So far, 95% of what Wictor has espoused/predicted has come to fruition.
Did you know you can read someone tweets without belonging to Twitter? Just add their twitter page to your favorites....then check in on them a few times a day. Here is wictor's twitter page https://twitter.com/ThomasWictor
So in the last 72 hours when this hysteria about Flynn, Russia, and investigations came out, I would read Wictor's tweets which would keep me calm. I guess many people are reading Mr. Wictor's tweets, enough so that this guy blogged about Wictor's revelation that Trump's installing Flynn was all about a *sting* Trump set up. I guess tell time will is this bears out but in the meantime, enjoy a fascinating read.
Fair use.
February 15, 2017 by mrbiggs
Is the Flynn resignation a sting?
As I’ve said before, I’m generally not into the day to day political gossip. Especially when the mainstream press cries impeachment wolf for the countless time. So when I heard of Flynn’s resignation I initially shrugged my shoulders.
But I also take a Trump victory seriously, and I take his pledge to #draintheswamp seriously. There’s lots of slimy things in the swamp that don’t want their precious habitat destroyed, and they fight back.
So when my friend Thomas Wictor started talking about how the Flynn resignation was a sting, I started paying attention. This could very well be phase I of Trump’s plan to drain the swamp. And an indication of just how serious Trump is about commmitting to his campaign promises.
Thomas’s theory was strung along in 20 tweets. I’ve compiled them in edited form for you below. Oh, and he does some great military and foreign policy research. You should check him out.
“Let’s say a person wants to hire a killer to bump off a spouse. They ask Mikey the Biker. Mikey goes to the cops. A police officer poses as a killer for hire. He asks the person 900 times if they REALLY want to kill the spouse. The cops says, “Let’s be clear: You want this person dead, right? You want me to shoot him in the head, right?”
It was clear that the CIA was telling the media stories about Flynn having inappropriate connections to Russia. Now, imagine Trump as a cop playing a killer for hire. He began ASKING THE CIA IF IT REALLY WANTED TO DO THIS.
January 11: Trump announces that he pulled a sting operation and identified intelligence official who leaked information. Director of National Intelligence James Clapper issues a statement opposing leaks.
January 23: The OBAMA FBI CLEARS FLYNN OF WRONGDOING in his conversation with the Russian ambassador.
Now, the murderous spouse goes ahead and tries to hire the killer.
Acting Attorney General Sally Yates warns the Trump administration that Flynn might be subject to blackmail by Russia. Yates bases her warning ON A TRANSCRIPT. She’s the first murderous spouse caught in the sting. She was fired January 31 for refusing to enforce the travel ban.
February 9: The New York times and Washington Post claim that Flynn discussed sanctions with the Russian ambassador. The articles are crap. They contradict themselves. This is from the Post.
If those intelligence officials have firsthand knowledge, why can’t they tell us a straight story?
New York Times. Again, total confusion about what was said.
Posted on February 15, 2017 by mrbiggs
Is the Flynn resignation a sting?
As I’ve said before, I’m generally not into the day to day political gossip. Especially when the mainstream press cries impeachment wolf for the countless time. So when I heard of Flynn’s resignation I initially shrugged my shoulders.
But I also take a Trump victory seriously, and I take his pledge to #draintheswamp seriously. There’s lots of slimy things in the swamp that don’t want their precious habitat destroyed, and they fight back.
So when my friend Thomas Wictor started talking about how the Flynn resignation was a sting, I started paying attention. This could very well be phase I of Trump’s plan to drain the swamp. And an indication of just how serious Trump is about commmitting to his campaign promises.
Thomas’s theory was strung along in 20 tweets. I’ve compiled them in edited form for you below. Oh, and he does some great military and foreign policy research. You should check him out.
“Let’s say a person wants to hire a killer to bump off a spouse. They ask Mikey the Biker. Mikey goes to the cops. A police officer poses as a killer for hire. He asks the person 900 times if they REALLY want to kill the spouse. The cops says, “Let’s be clear: You want this person dead, right? You want me to shoot him in the head, right?”
It was clear that the CIA was telling the media stories about Flynn having inappropriate connections to Russia. Now, imagine Trump as a cop playing a killer for hire. He began ASKING THE CIA IF IT REALLY WANTED TO DO THIS.
January 11: Trump announces that he pulled a sting operation and identified intelligence official who leaked information. Director of National Intelligence James Clapper issues a statement opposing leaks.
January 23: The OBAMA FBI CLEARS FLYNN OF WRONGDOING in his conversation with the Russian ambassador.
Now, the murderous spouse goes ahead and tries to hire the killer.
Acting Attorney General Sally Yates warns the Trump administration that Flynn might be subject to blackmail by Russia. Yates bases her warning ON A TRANSCRIPT. She’s the first murderous spouse caught in the sting. She was fired January 31 for refusing to enforce the travel ban.
February 9: The New York times and Washington Post claim that Flynn discussed sanctions with the Russian ambassador. The articles are crap. They contradict themselves. This is from the Post.
If those intelligence officials have firsthand knowledge, why can’t they tell us a straight story?
New York Times. Again, total confusion about what was said.
Finally, the proof that this was a sting: FLYNN KNEW HE WAS BEING RECORDED. From the Times.
Trump warned, Clapper warned, and the FBI warned, but the CIA went ahead and leaked ANYWAY. Trump, Flynn, Clapper, and he FBI set up the CIA. And now the CIA gets to have its peepee whacked REALLY HARD. Right now a bunch of fat drunks are making deals with the feds to keep out of prison.
Why would Trump be impeached? You have to commit a crime to be impeached. Stop being silly. The end.”
http://ronfor37.org/2017/02/15/is-the-flynn-resignation-a-sting/
