BRKG Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore has collapsed

Wildweasel

F-4 Phantoms Phorever
From another angle the ship turned straight into it. Ship should have been sailing in the middle of the supports, not very close to the one it hit. Also, WHY would the ship turn hard to starboard instead of staying on course when the lights go out? Looks deliberate to me.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1772603254213341658
The ship lost power, which means it also lost its steering ability. In a no-wind condition it would have gone straight forward when the steering was lost.

But weather conditions had a 13 knot (roughly 15mph) wind pushing the ship from its left side. Unable to steer against the wind they were pushed by the wind into a head-on collision with the bridge tower, because there was not proper protection for the tower against ships colliding with it.
 

Wildweasel

F-4 Phantoms Phorever
Not to throw cold water on the doom-fest, but it was an accident. Cascading failures lead to this. The same thing could have easily happened to me, and everyone else who's worked on the water for more than a few years.

Headed home from a LONG 3 weeks.on the boat, signing off for now.

ETA:
I'm NOT a govt disinformation officer. Just trying t o keep yall from going down dry rabbit holes.
Welcome ashore, Captain. Will three weeks be long enough for you regain your land legs?
 

Johnny Twoguns

Senior Member
You may be unaware, but Capt. Eddie is a boat captain... BIG boat captain. I'll listen to his reasoned analysis over all the hair on fire conspiracies, especially when those spouting them obviously haven't read al, the posts.

THEY LOST POWER...that means *no rudder*, wh8ch means *no steering*. The current is strong there, and reportedly at high/flood tide.

They dropped an anchor, hoping to help turn the ship away from the bridge, but it essentially acted like a pivot to turn right into the support.

And apparently (all of this is from our expert members above... I'm a landlubber!) a significant percentage of ship's masters/captains are Ukrainian.

If it had been a deliberate terrorist activity , they wouldn't have called Mayday and saved a bunch of lives.

Summerthyme
I picked up on all that. And I'm not disparaging his views nor his expertise, but just because something could be an accident; with all that is going on in the world today, doesn't mean it IS an accident.

Not to argue, but I remember a time when 99.99% of the American people took 911 at face value, and it took well over a decade for the majority, and it is now a majority, to stop believing what they had been fed in the official story.

I've been following the over 129 food plants, farms, etc that have been burned down in this country, all the oil refineries that have "had accidents", all the MAJOR train derailments, all since the obamaista's got back in. Much of that has been sabotage, no doubt about it.

And we are being invaded at the same time by over 10 million and that is no accident. This country is under assault.

This could have been an accident, this could have been deliberate.

I don't accept any major damage like this as just happenstance until it is proven as such, not under the present conditions. Buick Electra posted a very good analysis of WHY this would be a perfect act of sabotage, and very very hard to prove.

Hard to prove unless someone can find a link between the Captain and some 3 letter, which also includes the Russians as possibilities. As I mentioned above this could also be a message, and if it happened to be such, the goofballs at the top will never admit it.
 

Millwright

Knuckle Dragger
_______________
By all appearances, the Captain did everything he could to avoid the collision.

Until something substantial is brought to light, I'll take this one at face value.

A thread can be started in ALT if peeps want to explore the possibility of bigfoot stowing away on that ship and the 5G, negative waves activated his nanites ingested from Jack Link's beef jerkey...making him disable the powerplants. :rolleyes:
 

Doc1

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Unlike Captain Eddie, I've never been the captain of a vessel, but I have been a deckhand on many and I worked as a commercial diver for many years.

Most importantly - for this thread at least - I've been onboard when the power was lost. Fortunately this was always out in the Gulf and not in congested waterways. Usually the problem was resolved quickly. Also, importantly, the tugs and workboats I was on had port and starboard engines. Usually, only one would go out, which is not nearly as bad as losing both.

Large merchant ships often only have one huge main engine and when that goes out you're in deep kimchee! I did find it odd that in the video the ship appeared to go dark several times. Large, modern ships almost always have large generators - separate from the main engine - to provide ship's power.

I don't know anything about the design of the ship in question, so for now I'm going to accept the idea that it was an accident. I'm always open to adjust my opinion if further evidence come out.

Best
Doc
 

Capt. Eddie

Veteran Member
Is not emergency "Aft Steering" required on merchant vessels? I tend to think that would be the case.
It's called 'crash astern", and yes it is a standard command. It's a propulsion command not a rudder comand. It involves overriding the shat brake and can easily shear either the prop key or the shaft itself, so it's only used in desperate situations. From the amount of cavitation right before impact I would say it was utilized.
 

John Green

Veteran Member
Yea, when Lara Logan and General Flynn, (two people who are as far away from sensationalism that you can get), are basically saying we were 'attacked,' I'm taking that to the bank.

I'm wondering if a few Mississippi bridge 'accidents' will be next? Wondering if they're trying to section us off for easier takeover.
I agree on Lara Logan but General Flynn has sounded a bit off lately. Of course he has an axe to grind so I get it.
 

psychgirl

Has No Life - Lives on TB
By all appearances, the Captain did everything he could to avoid the collision.

Until something substantial is brought to light, I'll take this one at face value.

A thread can be started in ALT if peeps want to explore the possibility of bigfoot stowing away on that ship and the 5G, negative waves activated his nanites ingested from Jack Link's beef jerkey...making him disable the powerplants. :rolleyes:
Well, yunno….
We all got our own bingo cards to bear.
 

bw

Fringe Ranger
It's called 'crash astern", and yes it is a standard command. It's a propulsion command not a rudder comand. It involves overriding the shat brake and can easily shear either the prop key or the shaft itself, so it's only used in desperate situations. From the amount of cavitation right before impact I would say it was utilized.
I don't think he meant a propulsion command, I think he meant a manual rudder control near the stern.
 

Buick Electra

TB2K Girls with Guns
Unlike Captain Eddie, I've never been the captain of a vessel, but I have been a deckhand on many and I worked as a commercial diver for many years.

Most importantly - for this thread at least - I've been onboard when the power was lost. Fortunately this was always out in the Gulf and not in congested waterways. Usually the problem was resolved quickly. Also, importantly, the tugs and workboats I was on had port and starboard engines. Usually, only one would go out, which is not nearly as bad as losing both.

Large merchant ships often only have one huge main engine and when that goes out you're in deep kimchee! I did find it odd that in the video the ship appeared to go dark several times. Large, modern ships almost always have large generators - separate from the main engine - to provide ship's power.

I don't know anything about the design of the ship in question, so for now I'm going to accept the idea that it was an accident. I'm always open to adjust my opinion if further evidence come out.

Best
Doc
Maybe someone with knowledge can answer.....

I know lights went out, and as has been explained, the generator came on then went out, but could someone just flip a switch for the main power to go out? And could that same person flip a switch to turn the generator off?
 

mecoastie

Veteran Member
Is not emergency "Aft Steering" required on merchant vessels? I tend to think that would be the case.
There is a requirement but it isn’t going to get rigged in the minute or 2 they had.

They did they only 2 things they realistically had time for. Crash astern and drop the ready anchor. But you have 100000 tons traveling at 8.5 knots. It doesn’t stop quickly.

Another thing to consider is that the rotation of the prop affects the way a ship moves. It is called prop walk and pushes the stern either port or starboard depending on direction of rotation and whether they are going ahead or astern. A right hand turning prop will push the stern to port when the vessel is going astern. Crashing astern without a rudder may have caused the vessel stern to push out to port. Just a guess on my part.
 

Tex88

Veteran Member

Ships backing up in the shipping lane South of Baltimore


iDoL5ev.jpeg
 

Capt. Eddie

Veteran Member
There is a requirement but it isn’t going to get rigged in the minute or 2 they had.

They did they only 2 things they realistically had time for. Crash astern and drop the ready anchor. But you have 100000 tons traveling at 8.5 knots. It doesn’t stop quickly.

Another thing to consider is that the rotation of the prop affects the way a ship moves. It is called prop walk and pushes the stern either port or starboard depending on direction of rotation and whether they are going ahead or astern. A right hand turning prop will push the stern to port when the vessel is going astern. Crashing astern without a rudder may have caused the vessel stern to push out to port. Just a guess on my part.
Damn, someone else who knows about boats. Love you brother, even if you're a coasty. Taking off again, on a 737
 

L.A.B.

Goodness before greatness.
Exactly! Awfully premature to say no terrorism. Until you know the cause you do not know what did not cause it. This is far too complex to jump to that conclusion.

Them saying "not terrorism" so soon is the main reason for my suspecting terrorism.

Shadow

^^^THAT^^^ and the sudden radical change (judo throw) into the pylons.

Everything about that event can•could be duplicated on computers.

•Known real-time GPS coordinates in 1/10th’s of meters or better

•Known weight
•Speed
•Resistance of water with tidal flow
•anchor drop point for sling effect
•into the vector of hazard
•Wind speed & Vector
•Combined shear values

…ETS
 
Last edited:

Johnny Twoguns

Senior Member
I was considering a Royal Caribbean cruise in early September to Canada / New England from Baltimore. :eek:
Not to rain on anyone's cruise parade (as I've often thought of taking one), but there is a certain demographic, by the dozens or apparently sometimes hundreds, that have ruined a lot of people's enjoyment of big cruises over the last 10 or so years. Think of a Popeye's fight on steroids. All kinds of videos out there showing why we can't have nice things anymore. Wherever 3 or more shall gather in their name, all hell tends to break out. Just a heads up if you were unaware.
 

Bogey

“Where liberty dwells, there is my country.”
It's called 'crash astern", and yes it is a standard command. It's a propulsion command not a rudder comand. It involves overriding the shat brake and can easily shear either the prop key or the shaft itself, so it's only used in desperate situations. From the amount of cavitation right before impact I would say it was utilized.
Thanks Cap. I was curious because the US Naval vessels I was on all had a physical compartment astern called "Aft Steering" It was always manned during transit through the harbor.

If steering was lost on the bridge, aft steering could take control of the rudder.
 

mecoastie

Veteran Member
Thanks Cap. I was curious because the US Naval vessels I was on all had a physical compartment astern called "Aft Steering" It was always manned during transit through the harbor.

If steering was lost on the bridge, aft steering could take control of the rudder.
All commercial vessels are required to have emergency steering back aft for that very reason. But it is not required to be manned to my knowledge. When we inspected foreign ships we made them operate it to make sure it was operational. I forget what the times were but it was required to from hard port to hard starboard in a certain amount of time.
 

packyderms_wife

Neither here nor there.
By all appearances, the Captain did everything he could to avoid the collision.

Until something substantial is brought to light, I'll take this one at face value.

A thread can be started in ALT if peeps want to explore the possibility of bigfoot stowing away on that ship and the 5G, negative waves activated his nanites ingested from Jack Link's beef jerkey...making him disable the powerplants. :rolleyes:

I was watching some international news on PBS World and a lot of sources are saying that the ship recently had a malfunction with its rudder, and that it wasn't repaired fully, and that there were concerns that it would have an accident.
 

KFhunter

Veteran Member
I don’t know how to bring vids over here from email….(friend sent a tiktok vid), but there is video footage showing blast signatures at each point where the bridge broke.

Dunno.

Great way to speed up demise of a nation.
No big casualty event required.

Just accidentally start removing key infrastructure.


I answered that question before anyone could bring tictok vids over

It’s the metallurgy of the carbon steel catastrophically failing, you can see it really well in low light conditions.

Someone who really knew their metallurgy could identify the steel type by its sparks, carbon throws flowers, mild steel throws spears etc
 
Top