bracketquant
Veteran Member
At 3:00 am, Charles is probably on his 4th leak of the night.It is coming on 3:00 am in London.
I doubt there will be any official announcement until later this morning.
There may be a leak. We'll see.
At 3:00 am, Charles is probably on his 4th leak of the night.It is coming on 3:00 am in London.
I doubt there will be any official announcement until later this morning.
There may be a leak. We'll see.
Very cute!!!That was a given. We can't be Russian to conclusions here...
At 3:00 am, Charles is probably on his 4th leak of the night.
Hey!!! Hold on!!! I resemble these remarks!Im on my second!
You never know what happens behind closed doors but William being an abuser would be shocking for many reasons. If he were to abdicate, regardless of the reason, I’m fairly certain it would be the end of the monarchy. I don’t think he would want his children to go through what he has at the hands of the press.Some speculation I had with a canadian friend last night was that William might be an abuser and the throne at that point would go to his first son with Princess Anne as appointed regent followed by Sarah as regent.
Other speculation was that if there was not domestic abuse, it could be a case where there would still be a regent appointed so that the kiddos could have a somewhat normal childhood with Mum and dad.
The thing that sticks out is the kiddos have been pulled out of school since Elizabeth died basically...
Other speculation could be that the throne could be pulling out from the WEF so that they might not get overthrown.
Or they are firing some ministers without advance warning getting ready to address the muslim violence factor
Or declaring war agains Russia or other existential threats.
Finasteride and Tamsulosin for the WIN. 1 per night and that is USUALLY around 0530.
Yeah, "
But the regent has to live in the UK, so right now after William it would be Andrew.You never know what happens behind closed doors but William being an abuser would be shocking for many reasons. If he were to abdicate, regardless of the reason, I’m fairly certain it would be the end of the monarchy. I don’t think he would want his children to go through what he has at the hands of the press.
Who is Sarah? The law is specific about who could be appointed Regent. Please see the following from the House of Commons Library…
In a Regency, a “Regent” is appointed to act on the monarch’s behalf.
A Regency applies if a monarch succeeds to the Throne before the age of 18, or if a monarch becomes permanently incapacitated due to “infirmity of mind or body”.
If a monarch becomes permanently incapacitated, the Regent assumes most of the monarch’s “Royal functions”, except granting Royal Assent to a Bill which alters the line of succession or the Scottish system of Presbyterian church government.
The Regent is the heir to the Throne unless they have not reached the age of 18. In such a case, the Regent is the next in the line of succession who has reached the age of 21.
In your scenario Harry would be appointed Regent. I don’t think that would go over well.
Why do you think the kids have been pulled from school since Elizabeth died? They are all students at a local primary school near their home in Windsor. Part of the reason why William has been scarce since Kate’s surgery is because he has been doing the school runs, etc…
https://commonslibrary.parliament.u...egency, a “Regent,infirmity of mind or body”.
What a ROYAL dog’s breakfast!Some speculation I had with a canadian friend last night was that William might be an abuser and the throne at that point would go to his first son with Princess Anne as appointed regent followed by Sarah as regent.
Other speculation was that if there was not domestic abuse, it could be a case where there would still be a regent appointed so that the kiddos could have a somewhat normal childhood with Mum and dad.
The thing that sticks out is the kiddos have been pulled out of school since Elizabeth died basically...
Other speculation could be that the throne could be pulling out from the WEF so that they might not get overthrown.
Or they are firing some ministers without advance warning getting ready to address the muslim violence factor
Or declaring war agains Russia or other existential threats.
Good point. Andrew would probably be less acceptable to the public than Harry. The line of succession gets messy after William & his children.Yeah, "
But the regent has to live in the UK, so right now after William it would be Andrew.
Are the kids in school or no? I’ve been wondering why we don’t see folks frothing at the mouth over William taking the kids to school solo. Or maybe in this example, ‘doing the school run’ means going and picking up their work from the teacher?Why do you think the kids have been pulled from school since Elizabeth died? They are all students at a local primary school near their home in Windsor. Part of the reason why William has been scarce since Kate’s surgery is because he has been doing the school runs, etc…
https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-9374/#:~:text=In a Regency, a “Regent,infirmity of mind or body”.
They are certainly in school, and William has been doing part of the school run while Kate cannot. The Palace "Advisors" are said to call him "The 10 am to 4 pm Prince" because he mostly commits to royal duties only during those hours so he can take the kids to school and pick them up in the afternoon.Are the kids in school or no? I’ve been wondering why we don’t see folks frothing at the mouth over William taking the kids to school solo. Or maybe in this example, ‘doing the school run’ means going and picking up their work from the teacher?
They are day students at the Lambrook School In Berkshire. “Doing the school run” means bringing them to school and picking them up every day.Are the kids in school or no? I’ve been wondering why we don’t see folks frothing at the mouth over William taking the kids to school solo. Or maybe in this example, ‘doing the school run’ means going and picking up their work from the teacher?
If you look at the link I posted earlier, the Regency Acts are law. It would take an act of Parliament to change the succession. As the law is written Harry would be Regent for George. The relevant part is as follows….If there were a regent for little George in regular times, it would usually be The Uncle (which would be Harry). In this case, I suspect that grand-uncle EDWARD (the quiet one) and his wife Sophie will be chosen. Both Harry and Andrew no longer perform royal duties. The other option would be Grandmother Ann. Edward and Ann would be the official regents together. Andrew will be quietly told that if he tries for the position, they will throw him to the American wolves over his association with Epstein.
Trust me, any Prime Minister worth their salt would have no trouble getting Parliament to pass an exemption or change to the act to avoid having Harry or Andrew in that position, especially as a regent for a child.If you look at the link I posted earlier, the Regency Acts are law. It would take an act of Parliament to change the succession. As the law is written Harry would be Regent for George. The relevant part is as follows….
The Regent is the heir to the Throne unless they have not reached the age of 18. In such a case, the Regent is the next in the line of succession who has reached the age of 21.
The Palace cannot change this. The Regency Acts 1937-1953 are the relevant legislation. It’s interesting that they were put into place after the abdication of Edward VIII. They thought they were safeguarding the crown against another crisis like the abdication crisis. No one could've foreseen the mess with Harry.
Where there's smoke there's fire. I bet something is going on and they're trying to suppress it.
“Any Prime Minister worth his salt”, that’s not Rishi Sunak. It’s doubtful that he will even be prime Minister much longer.Trust me, any Prime Minister worth their salt would have no trouble getting Parliament to pass an exemption or change to the act to avoid having Harry or Andrew in that position, especially as a regent for a child.
Harry, I'd say there's at least a twenty-five percent (or slightly higher) chance of some accommodation made in a grave crisis. Meghan might have to have an official "keep out" order for such a regency (on paper, anyway) or told to either sign away her royal title (she can do that) or end her Hollywood career and act like a Duchess at least in public. I'd suspect there might be a divorce at that point, but then a divorced Harry would be considered much faster than when he is married to a severe problem, Duchess.
This is also why I suspect Grand-Uncle Edward might be seen as a compromise since he is an "Uncle" and hasn't had any issues attached to him since he was quite young (there were some problems a few decades ago, but he and his wife learned their lessons—that's another story).
as long as he leaves here I don't care where he goes!I think I've figured it out! Obama is going to take over for Charles...
View: https://twitter.com/TheInsiderPaper/status/1769758966182019387
Sarah Ferguson, William and Harry's Aunt. She was married to Prince Andrew. Her daughters are in line to the throne. She is not eligible to be regent because she is not on line for the throneYou never know what happens behind closed doors but William being an abuser would be shocking for many reasons. If he were to abdicate, regardless of the reason, I’m fairly certain it would be the end of the monarchy. I don’t think he would want his children to go through what he has at the hands of the press.
Who is Sarah? The law is specific about who could be appointed Regent. Please see the following from the House of Commons Library…
In a Regency, a “Regent” is appointed to act on the monarch’s behalf.
A Regency applies if a monarch succeeds to the Throne before the age of 18, or if a monarch becomes permanently incapacitated due to “infirmity of mind or body”.
If a monarch becomes permanently incapacitated, the Regent assumes most of the monarch’s “Royal functions”, except granting Royal Assent to a Bill which alters the line of succession or the Scottish system of Presbyterian church government.
The Regent is the heir to the Throne unless they have not reached the age of 18. In such a case, the Regent is the next in the line of succession who has reached the age of 21.
In your scenario Harry would be appointed Regent. I don’t think that would go over well.
Why do you think the kids have been pulled from school since Elizabeth died? They are all students at a local primary school near their home in Windsor. Part of the reason why William has been scarce since Kate’s surgery is because he has been doing the school runs, etc…
https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-9374/#:~:text=In a Regency, a “Regent,infirmity of mind or body”.
I meant ANY Prime Minister, I know that Rishi is likely not going to last much longer. I pay some attention to UK politics because Northern Ireland is still part of the UK and that is part of the Island that I live on.“Any Prime Minister worth his salt”, that’s not Rishi Sunak. It’s doubtful that he will even be prime Minister much longer.
Regardless, this entire conversation is predicated on a scenario where there would be a Regency for George while William is still alive. That will never, ever happen. If William is removed from the line of succession he will take his children with him. A Regency if William were to die is another story. I do think there would be a way back for Harry in that circumstance if he were to divorce Meghan. It wouldn’t be easy but the path would be there. If there was any real desire to remove him from the line of succession or even remove his titles Parliament would‘ve already done it.
Whatever it is, he's up to no good. Undermining Trump in some way, no doubt.Bams was over in Downing Street today.......... Hmmmm.............
View attachment 465818
View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1769759071903588835
But they all live there, right? So it's not unusual for them to be there. Except Obama of courseObama isnt the only one flying into London unexpectedly - Prince Andrew just arrived, Princess Anne came earlier as did Beatrice and Eugenie, and other royalty from throughout the United Kingdom and beyond. Duke and Duchess of Gloucester arrived too (Prince Richard and Brigitte - Charles' aunt and uncle) and Princess Alexandra (Charles' cousin).
My guess is that Charles, knowing his time is short, is going to give the crown to William and wants to do it while he is alive, OR he has such a short time, people are coming to say goodbyes.
As far as I know, Harry hasn't actually abdicated, and is still in line; if he had, then he couldn't be regent.Sarah Ferguson, William and Harry's Aunt. She was married to Prince Andrew. Her daughters are in line to the throne. She is not eligible to be regent because she is not on line for the throne
Succession is - William(1), Williams, children: George (2), Charlotte (3), then Louis (4), then Prince Andrew (5), then Beatrice (6) and Eugenie (7), his daughters.
So if William abdicates, then it is George, who is only 10 since Harry also abdicated and lost all claim to the throne. The official regent would be Harry until George reaches the age of 18. But requirements are that Harry be over 21, be of royal descent and have a domicile in the UK, which I dont think they have anymore since they sold Frogmore Cottage. However, with amendment, the Duchess of Cambridge (Katherine) could be appointed regent.
But all this is probably mute because this is the LAST scenario I would guess. Most likely it is an announcement that Charles doesnt have much longer and they are setting up William to take the crown.
Obama is probably there so he can give his orders to Joe when he gets back in the US.But they all live there, right? So it's not unusual for them to be there. Except Obama of course
That is interesting, and certainly within the realm of possibility, I guess.Obama isnt the only one flying into London unexpectedly - Prince Andrew just arrived, Princess Anne came earlier as did Beatrice and Eugenie, and other royalty from throughout the United Kingdom and beyond. Duke and Duchess of Gloucester arrived too (Prince Richard and Brigitte - Charles' aunt and uncle) and Princess Alexandra (Charles' cousin).
My guess is that Charles, knowing his time is short, is going to give the crown to William and wants to do it while he is alive, OR he has such a short time, people are coming to say goodbyes.
No, what is unusual is that they arrived by helicopter all day long, one after the other on the front of BP and then all flew back to Balmoral in Scotland and landed there, one after the other. Yes, most live in the UK, but they dont all go at once to the King's home residences on the same day. Something is up.But they all live there, right? So it's not unusual for them to be there. Except Obama of course