HEALTH Monkeypox - more bad news

Status
Not open for further replies.

Seeker22

Has No Life - Lives on TB
People, we need to get our terminology straight.

Fomites do not stick on surfaces or fly through the air. They are NOT particles, they are objects.

Read the definition:

"A fomite is any inanimate object (also called passive vector) that, when contaminated with or exposed to infectious agents (such as pathogenic bacteria, viruses or fungi), can transfer disease to a new host.[1][2] Contamination can occur when one of these objects comes into contact with bodily secretions, like nasal fluid, vomit, or feces. Many common objects can sustain a pathogen until a person comes in contact with the pathogen, increasing the chance of infection. The likely objects are different in a hospital environment than at home or in a workplace.[3] Fomites such as splinters, barbed wire or farmyard surfaces, including soil, feeding troughs or barn beams, have been implicated as sources of virus.[4]"


Hospital fomites​

Detecting whether medics have inadvertently transferred fluids to their clothing during a training sequence using simulated bodily fluids carrying an ultraviolet dye

For humans, common hospital fomites are skin cells, hair, clothing, and bedding.[5]

Fomites are associated particularly with hospital-acquired infections (HAIs), as they are possible routes to pass pathogens between patients. Stethoscopes and neckties are common fomites associated with health care providers.[6] It worries epidemiologists and hospital practitioners because of the growing selection of microbes resistant to disinfectants or antibiotics (so-called antimicrobial resistance phenomenon).[citation needed]

Basic hospital equipment, such as IV drip tubes, catheters, and life support equipment, can also be carriers, when the pathogens form biofilms on the surfaces. Careful sterilization of such objects prevents cross-infection.[7] Used syringes, if improperly handled, are particularly dangerous fomites.[citation needed]


Daily life​

In addition to objects in hospital settings, other common fomites for humans are cups, spoons, pencils, bath faucet handles, toilet flush levers, door knobs, light switches, handrails, elevator buttons, television remote controls, pens, touch screens, common-use phones, keyboards and computer mice, coffeepot handles, countertops, drinking fountains, and any other items that may be frequently touched by different people and infrequently cleaned.[2][8]

Cold sores, hand–foot–mouth disease, and diarrhea are some examples of illnesses easily spread by contaminated fomites.[9] The risk of infection by these diseases and others through fomites can be greatly reduced by simply washing one's hands.[9] When two children in one household have influenza, more than 50% of shared items are contaminated with virus. In 40–90% cases, adults infected with rhinovirus have it on their hands.[10]


Transmission of specific viruses​

Researchers have discovered that smooth (non-porous) surfaces like door knobs transmit bacteria and viruses better than porous materials like paper money because porous, especially fibrous, materials absorb and trap the contagion, making it harder to contract through simple touch.[11] Nonetheless, fomites may include soiled clothes, towels, linens, handkerchiefs, and surgical dressings.[12][13]

SARS-CoV-2 was found to be viable on various surfaces from 4 to 72 hours under laboratory conditions. On porous surfaces, studies report inability to detect viable virus within minutes to hours; on non-porous surfaces, viable virus can be detected for days to weeks.[2][14] However, further research called into question the accuracy of such tests, instead finding fomite transmission of SARS-Cov-2 in real world settings is extremely rare if not impossible.[15][16][17][18]

Contact with aerosolized virus (large droplet spread) generated via talking, sneezing, coughing, or vomiting, or contact with airborne virus that settles after disturbance of a contaminated fomite (e.g. shaking a contaminated blanket). During the first 24 hours, the risk can be reduced by increasing ventilation and waiting as long as possible before entering the space (at least several hours, based on documented airborne transmission cases), and using personal protective equipment (including any protection needed for the cleaning and disinfection products) to reduce risk.[2][8]

The 2007 research showed that the influenza virus was still active on stainless steel 24 hours after contamination. Though on hands it survives only for five minutes, the constant contact with a fomite almost certainly means catching the infection.[19] Transfer efficiency depends not only on surface, but mainly on pathogen type. For example, avian influenza survives on both porous and non-porous materials for 144 hours.[11]

Smallpox was long supposed to be transmitted either by direct contact or by fomites. However A. R. Rao’s careful researches in the 1960s, before smallpox was declared extinct, found little truth in the traditional belief that smallpox can be spread at a distance through infected clothing or bedding. He concluded that it normally invaded via the lungs.[20] Rao recognized that the virus can be detected on inanimate objects, and therefore might in some cases be transmitted by them, but he concluded that “smallpox is still an inhalation disease . . . the virus has to enter through the nose by inhalation.”[21]

In 2002 Donald K. Milton published a review of existing research upon the transmission of smallpox and upon recommendations for controlling its spread in the event of its use in biological war. He agreed, citing Rao, Fenner and others, that “careful epidemiologic investigation rarely implicated fomites as a source of infection”; and broadly agreed with current recommendations for control of secondary smallpox infections, which emphasized transmission via “expelled droplets” upon the breath. He noted that shed scabs (which might be spread via bedsheets or other fomites) often contain “large quantities of virus”, but suggested that the “apparent lack of infectiousness of scab associated virus” might be due to “encapsulation with inspissated pus”. [22]

Contaminated needles are the most common fomite that transmits HIV.[23] Dirty needles also easily spread Hepatitis B.[24]

If you caught that error off my Twitter post #1154, good on you! I'm in process of cooking and cleaning between posting. Had intended to follow up on the error by Twitter poster Dr. Sean Mullen, and just hadn't gotten back to the computer yet.

How does a Doctor not know the clinical definition of the word Fomites?
 

Tristan

TB Fanatic
3 new cases of Mpox in New York in addition to NJ and California. It’s almost as if The WHO knew what was happening longer than they let on.

View: https://twitter.com/AcrossTheMersey/status/1824277085856170136

The WHO has been lobbying hard for increased Powers to 'deal' with health 'threats' around the Globe.

A naked power grab.

I would expect them to take every opportunity to work this, and every following situation, toward that end.
 

raven

TB Fanatic

Current Evidence Demonstrates That Monkeypox Is a Sexually Transmitted Infection​

Lao-Tzu Allan-Blitz, MD∗ and Jeffrey D. Klausner, MD, MPH†


The rapidly developing global outbreak of monkeypox, declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern by the World Health Organization,1 has demonstrated transmission dynamics uncharacteristic of prior outbreaks. Historically, outbreaks of monkeypox have been short-lived, mostly limited to already endemic tropical rainforest regions, with infections transmitted through predominantly animal-to-human contact, as well as human-to-human transmission via close contact with an infected individual.2 Over the past several months, however, the current outbreak of monkeypox has spread more rapidly and pervasively than any previous outbreak1 and with mounting evidence that sexual contact is the most common mode of transmission.36 But whether monkeypox constitutes a sexually transmitted infection, or simply one that is transmissible via sex, and why that distinction is important are subject to ongoing debate.
Go to:

WHAT CONSTITUTES A SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTION?​

Sexually transmitted infections are typically defined as being caused by an infectious microorganism that can be transmitted from one person to another through bodily fluids (blood, semen, vaginal fluids, rectal fluid, or saliva) during oral, anal, or vaginal sex with an infected partner.7 Direct inoculation via skin-to-skin contact during sex is another mode of transmission common to other sexually transmitted infections such as herpes simplex virus type 2.8 Furthermore, the World Health Organization identifies 30 pathogens that are transmissible through sex but reserves the label of sexually transmitted infection for those that are predominantly transmitted through sex.9 But does monkeypox virus meet the aforementioned criteria for a sexually transmitted infection?
First, the evidence that monkeypox virus is transmissible during sexual activity is numerous. Monkeypox viral DNA has been identified in seminal fluid,4,10,11 rectal swab specimens,10 tests of respiratory secretions,2,10,12 and blood.12 Furthermore, a recent study isolated monkeypox virus from the semen of an infected individual and demonstrated infectiveness of that virus in vitro.11 Thus, bodily fluids, in particular semen, may transmit monkeypox virus. In addition, direct inoculation by skin-to-skin contact during sex may explain the numerous reports documenting index lesions occurring at the genitalia, rectum, and oropharynx46,13,14 before subsequent clinical dissemination.
Whether or not sexual contact is the predominant mode of transmission is more challenging to establish. From reports during the current monkeypox outbreak, 84% to 100% of cases have endorsed sexual activity, often with a new sex partner, before the development of monkeypox, providing evidence of a temporal association between sexual contact and the disease.36,10,1416 Furthermore, practices conferring elevated risk for other sexually transmitted infections are frequently reported among cases of monkeypox; such practices have included attending sex-on-site venues, group sex, multiple recent sex partners, and condomless receptive anal intercourse.3,4,6,10,15 In addition, there seems to be an anatomic association between sexual practices and the location of lesion development. One series reported that the risk of proctitis due to monkeypox was 5.5 times higher among those who recently engaged in receptive anal intercourse compared with those who did not engage in receptive anal intercourse, and that 95% of patients who presented with tonsilitis reported receptive oral sex in the preceding days.6 Finally, such transmission dynamics would further explain the vastly disproportionate burden of disease among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men who constitute 92% to 100% of the currently reported monkeypox cases,3,4,6,14 as well as the high prevalence of concurrent sexually transmitted infections (17%–29%) among the patients with monkeypox.4,6,10
Taken in context, the temporal and anatomic association with various sex practices, the high prevalence of sexual risk behavior among patients with monkeypox, and the in vitro infectiousness of monkeypox virus isolated from semen strongly suggest that monkeypox can be and is predominantly transmitted through sexual activities. Indeed, one report concluded that all secondary cases of monkeypox were likely due to sexual transmission—that conclusion was based on anogenital and perineal localization of the rash in 72% of cases, associated inguinal lymphadenopathy in 72% of cases, and frequent report of sexual activity including condomless anal intercourse and sex with multiple partners within the preceding 3 weeks among 84% of cases.15 Another report of more than 500 cases globally similarly noted that the clinicians seeing patients suspected sexual transmission in 95% of cases,4 although the specifics on how that determination was made were unavailable. Further supporting the nearly exclusive sexual spread of infection in the current outbreak is the infrequency of reported household transmission of monkeypox (1%–3%).4,6
Worth highlighting; however, the recent findings are predominantly derived from the United States and Europe. The role of sexual transmission among cases in Africa is less clear. An unpublished report of cases of monkeypox presenting to a hospital in the Democratic Republic of the Congo between 2007 and 2011 identified exposure to wild animals and handling of uncooked meat as the primary source of exposure for the majority of cases.17 Data from cases of monkeypox in Nigeria from 2017 to 2018 noted that the rash localized to the genitalia in 47% to 68% of cases.1820 Sexual risk factors were not explored in those studies, but the authors speculated on the possibility of sexual transmission. Finally, a report from the current outbreak in peer review documented 6 linked cases of sexual transmission in Nigeria.16 The data on the transmission dynamics of monkeypox virus within Africa during the current outbreak, however, remain limited. Thus, the actual proportion of cases being transmitted globally via sexual contact is unknown.
Go to:

WHY DOES IT MATTER?​

The ramifications of classifying monkeypox as a sexually transmitted infection instead of an infection that is transmissible via sex are important to acknowledge. On the one hand, the stigma surrounding sexually transmitted infections limits health care seeking and partner-notification behaviors,21,22 directly subverting our primary means of outbreak control—namely, early identification and behavior change in infected individuals. Furthermore, such stigma can fuel homophobia, particularly in areas without human rights protections for individuals who engage in same-sex relationships.23 Conversely, failure to appropriately identify and disseminate to the public the predominant mode of transmission will likely perpetuate behaviors that are driving transmission. Identifying high-risk subpopulations, in this case gay, bisexual or other men who have sex with men, who have multiple partners, or who participate in group sex will facilitate targeted awareness and education efforts, exposure reduction, and other disease intervention activities such as testing, treatment, and vaccination, which in turn may augment control efforts and prove to be cost effective. Such efforts are analogous to what was eventually implemented in combating the human immunodeficiency virus pandemic with notable success.24
Furthermore, the current guidelines recommend isolation of individuals infected with monkeypox virus until complete resolution of symptoms and healing of the rash, which can last for up to 4 weeks.25 We have already observed the numerous socioeconomic consequences of 14 days of isolation recommended during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in the form of lost productivity, missed school days, and disruptions in supply chain and agriculture production.26 If monkeypox is in fact predominantly transmitted through sex, which the evidence suggests that it is, that prolonged duration of isolation and thus the consequent socioeconomic burdens may be unnecessary.
But monkeypox is not exclusively transmitted through sexual contact.2 A related poxvirus, molluscum contagiosum, has similar transmission characteristics, which can be transmitted via skin-to-skin contact and sexual contact.27 Human herpes simplex viruses similarly can be transmitted via close contact and through contact with bodily fluids during sex.8 Similarly, Treponema pallidum pallidum, the cause of syphilis, is predominantly transmitted through sexual contact,28 yet historical reports before the routine use of protective gloves frequently noted syphilitic lesions on the fingers of physicians acquired via nonsexual skin-to-skin contact,29,30 and via human bites.31 Thus, universality of sexual transmission is not a requisite of sexually transmitted infections.
Go to:

CONCLUSIONS​

The transmission dynamics of monkeypox in the current outbreak are highly consistent with a sexually transmitted infection. We must therefore, incorporate a sexual health framework into our response to the current outbreak while destigmatizing both the disease and its route of transmission. Targeted screening among populations with high risk for other sexually transmitted infections may be important strategies for case identification. Finally, further work should evaluate formally the transmissibility of monkeypox from different bodily fluids through experimental studies and careful epidemiologic analyses with particular attention to the possibility of differing transmission dynamics in different regions of the globe.
 

helen

Panic Sex Lady

Current Evidence Demonstrates That Monkeypox Is a Sexually Transmitted Infection​

Lao-Tzu Allan-Blitz, MD∗ and Jeffrey D. Klausner, MD, MPH†


The rapidly developing global outbreak of monkeypox, declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern by the World Health Organization,1 has demonstrated transmission dynamics uncharacteristic of prior outbreaks. Historically, outbreaks of monkeypox have been short-lived, mostly limited to already endemic tropical rainforest regions, with infections transmitted through predominantly animal-to-human contact, as well as human-to-human transmission via close contact with an infected individual.2 Over the past several months, however, the current outbreak of monkeypox has spread more rapidly and pervasively than any previous outbreak1 and with mounting evidence that sexual contact is the most common mode of transmission.36 But whether monkeypox constitutes a sexually transmitted infection, or simply one that is transmissible via sex, and why that distinction is important are subject to ongoing debate.
Go to:

WHAT CONSTITUTES A SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTION?​

Sexually transmitted infections are typically defined as being caused by an infectious microorganism that can be transmitted from one person to another through bodily fluids (blood, semen, vaginal fluids, rectal fluid, or saliva) during oral, anal, or vaginal sex with an infected partner.7 Direct inoculation via skin-to-skin contact during sex is another mode of transmission common to other sexually transmitted infections such as herpes simplex virus type 2.8 Furthermore, the World Health Organization identifies 30 pathogens that are transmissible through sex but reserves the label of sexually transmitted infection for those that are predominantly transmitted through sex.9 But does monkeypox virus meet the aforementioned criteria for a sexually transmitted infection?
First, the evidence that monkeypox virus is transmissible during sexual activity is numerous. Monkeypox viral DNA has been identified in seminal fluid,4,10,11 rectal swab specimens,10 tests of respiratory secretions,2,10,12 and blood.12 Furthermore, a recent study isolated monkeypox virus from the semen of an infected individual and demonstrated infectiveness of that virus in vitro.11 Thus, bodily fluids, in particular semen, may transmit monkeypox virus. In addition, direct inoculation by skin-to-skin contact during sex may explain the numerous reports documenting index lesions occurring at the genitalia, rectum, and oropharynx46,13,14 before subsequent clinical dissemination.
Whether or not sexual contact is the predominant mode of transmission is more challenging to establish. From reports during the current monkeypox outbreak, 84% to 100% of cases have endorsed sexual activity, often with a new sex partner, before the development of monkeypox, providing evidence of a temporal association between sexual contact and the disease.36,10,1416 Furthermore, practices conferring elevated risk for other sexually transmitted infections are frequently reported among cases of monkeypox; such practices have included attending sex-on-site venues, group sex, multiple recent sex partners, and condomless receptive anal intercourse.3,4,6,10,15 In addition, there seems to be an anatomic association between sexual practices and the location of lesion development. One series reported that the risk of proctitis due to monkeypox was 5.5 times higher among those who recently engaged in receptive anal intercourse compared with those who did not engage in receptive anal intercourse, and that 95% of patients who presented with tonsilitis reported receptive oral sex in the preceding days.6 Finally, such transmission dynamics would further explain the vastly disproportionate burden of disease among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men who constitute 92% to 100% of the currently reported monkeypox cases,3,4,6,14 as well as the high prevalence of concurrent sexually transmitted infections (17%–29%) among the patients with monkeypox.4,6,10
Taken in context, the temporal and anatomic association with various sex practices, the high prevalence of sexual risk behavior among patients with monkeypox, and the in vitro infectiousness of monkeypox virus isolated from semen strongly suggest that monkeypox can be and is predominantly transmitted through sexual activities. Indeed, one report concluded that all secondary cases of monkeypox were likely due to sexual transmission—that conclusion was based on anogenital and perineal localization of the rash in 72% of cases, associated inguinal lymphadenopathy in 72% of cases, and frequent report of sexual activity including condomless anal intercourse and sex with multiple partners within the preceding 3 weeks among 84% of cases.15 Another report of more than 500 cases globally similarly noted that the clinicians seeing patients suspected sexual transmission in 95% of cases,4 although the specifics on how that determination was made were unavailable. Further supporting the nearly exclusive sexual spread of infection in the current outbreak is the infrequency of reported household transmission of monkeypox (1%–3%).4,6
Worth highlighting; however, the recent findings are predominantly derived from the United States and Europe. The role of sexual transmission among cases in Africa is less clear. An unpublished report of cases of monkeypox presenting to a hospital in the Democratic Republic of the Congo between 2007 and 2011 identified exposure to wild animals and handling of uncooked meat as the primary source of exposure for the majority of cases.17 Data from cases of monkeypox in Nigeria from 2017 to 2018 noted that the rash localized to the genitalia in 47% to 68% of cases.1820 Sexual risk factors were not explored in those studies, but the authors speculated on the possibility of sexual transmission. Finally, a report from the current outbreak in peer review documented 6 linked cases of sexual transmission in Nigeria.16 The data on the transmission dynamics of monkeypox virus within Africa during the current outbreak, however, remain limited. Thus, the actual proportion of cases being transmitted globally via sexual contact is unknown.
Go to:

WHY DOES IT MATTER?​

The ramifications of classifying monkeypox as a sexually transmitted infection instead of an infection that is transmissible via sex are important to acknowledge. On the one hand, the stigma surrounding sexually transmitted infections limits health care seeking and partner-notification behaviors,21,22 directly subverting our primary means of outbreak control—namely, early identification and behavior change in infected individuals. Furthermore, such stigma can fuel homophobia, particularly in areas without human rights protections for individuals who engage in same-sex relationships.23 Conversely, failure to appropriately identify and disseminate to the public the predominant mode of transmission will likely perpetuate behaviors that are driving transmission. Identifying high-risk subpopulations, in this case gay, bisexual or other men who have sex with men, who have multiple partners, or who participate in group sex will facilitate targeted awareness and education efforts, exposure reduction, and other disease intervention activities such as testing, treatment, and vaccination, which in turn may augment control efforts and prove to be cost effective. Such efforts are analogous to what was eventually implemented in combating the human immunodeficiency virus pandemic with notable success.24
Furthermore, the current guidelines recommend isolation of individuals infected with monkeypox virus until complete resolution of symptoms and healing of the rash, which can last for up to 4 weeks.25 We have already observed the numerous socioeconomic consequences of 14 days of isolation recommended during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in the form of lost productivity, missed school days, and disruptions in supply chain and agriculture production.26 If monkeypox is in fact predominantly transmitted through sex, which the evidence suggests that it is, that prolonged duration of isolation and thus the consequent socioeconomic burdens may be unnecessary.
But monkeypox is not exclusively transmitted through sexual contact.2 A related poxvirus, molluscum contagiosum, has similar transmission characteristics, which can be transmitted via skin-to-skin contact and sexual contact.27 Human herpes simplex viruses similarly can be transmitted via close contact and through contact with bodily fluids during sex.8 Similarly, Treponema pallidum pallidum, the cause of syphilis, is predominantly transmitted through sexual contact,28 yet historical reports before the routine use of protective gloves frequently noted syphilitic lesions on the fingers of physicians acquired via nonsexual skin-to-skin contact,29,30 and via human bites.31 Thus, universality of sexual transmission is not a requisite of sexually transmitted infections.
Go to:

CONCLUSIONS​

The transmission dynamics of monkeypox in the current outbreak are highly consistent with a sexually transmitted infection. We must therefore, incorporate a sexual health framework into our response to the current outbreak while destigmatizing both the disease and its route of transmission. Targeted screening among populations with high risk for other sexually transmitted infections may be important strategies for case identification. Finally, further work should evaluate formally the transmissibility of monkeypox from different bodily fluids through experimental studies and careful epidemiologic analyses with particular attention to the possibility of differing transmission dynamics in different regions of the globe.

This article is from February 2023.

Clade one-b was not isolated until September 2023.

Don't confound the clades. It's bad enough. I'm nearly out of coffee.
 

Seeker22

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Whoopsie!



View attachment 492221

Man, you really have to ramp up your discernment these days. People will post literally anything.

View: https://twitter.com/toobaffled/status/1824714685721284897
 

Meemur

Voice on the Prairie
For those who live in and near college towns: when are the students returning? I strongly suggest that you finish major shopping before then.

This is why I pried myself out of bed early, again, got a haircut (cheap with coupon) and loaded up on heavy stuff, like cat litter, that is difficult to carry on a bicycle.

Now, if I need to, I can ride my bike to the nearby store or farmers market for produce. My fall crop (peas and such) will be ready in about six weeks.
 

Signwatcher

Has No Life - Lives on TB
I think when my dad was assigned Egypt and the family went over there, I had about three weeks of getting tons of vaccinations, I do not even remember what all for. Seems like it was almost 20.

I sometimes wonder if they had an effect on me. Like my ADHD(then known as hyperactivity)

I've wondered that, myself about my ADHD/ADD (lost the hyper ness after the Epstein-Barr Virus hit at age 23). Also, my Bro was bipolar and my Son is Socio-affective with Psych tendencies.

I remember my Bro as a toddler crying and crying for no apparent reason (he wasn't a reasonable individual during childhood or adulthood and was a brawler). The Ex always said our Son changed in personality after his boosters (at about the same age as when my Bro started exhibiting his changes). Both individuals were quite alike, which is common with uncles and aunts and nephews and nieces.
 

Voortrekker

Veteran Member
Was reading about skin care of Mpox lesions, and Phisoderm popped into my head.

Phisoderm is Ph balanced, gentle skin care products with no scent or other extras. Hospitals used it long ago.

Still found on Amazon in several forms- might want to add some to preps? Before the thundering herd starts panic buying.
Which Phisoderm? Skin care, soap, shampoo? Online has a bunch of choices.
 

Tristan

TB Fanatic
Everything about plandemics, old and new, is a lie. The perpetrators are evil and apparently stupid.

Certainly evil, though not so sure about the stupid part. They did basically pull it off last time, right?

However, they certainly count on enough of the population to be so afflicted.

And to be lacking in discernment.

And to be mesmerized by the MSM.

And so on.
 

phloydius

Veteran Member
Helen,

I just created this thread for you:


(I'll start adding content to it in a moment), assuming it is not a dup.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top